@cortes123 You are sying things the opposite way. Hope this helps…
allowable risk of overreliance increased the smaller the sample size.
What they are saying is that: as the auditor increased the ALLOWABLE risk of averreliance ( the auditor is accepting MORE risk) the sample size decreases…..
So with that said if the auditor decreases the allowable risk of averreliance (the auditor is willing to accept LESS risk) the sample size will increase
so with that said if the auditor is NOT willing to accept any risk than the auditor has to test the whole population which is the reason the auditor has to accept some risk (thus sample risk)
Another way you can look at it which makes it easy
100% = population
5% = the auditors sample risk ( the auditor is willing to accept only being 5% wrong that the sample will not represent the population
95%= so the auditor will be 95% confident that the results represent the population.
Watch how this changes
100%=population
10% = the auditor sample risk (the auditor is willing to accept more risk!! (idk maybe the auditor thinks the chances are slim that a MM exists due to pass experience or control risk in Risk assessment were low)
90% = so now the auditor is only 90% confident that the sample results represent the polulation
so if the auditor is willing to accept more risk the sample size decreases…
if the auditor is willing to accept less risk the sample size increases…
if the auditor is willing to accept NO risk the auditor will have to test the whole population, (so maybe the auditor should not rely on controls bc we need to accept some risk to do sample right?) ….
Hope this helps 🙂 .
AUD 69, 92 7/15 Gleim and Ninja test bank
FAR sometime in 10/15 Gleim
BEC not taken
REG not taken