Anyone can help me with this question?
In the first audit of a client, an auditor was not able to gather sufficient evidence about the consistent application of accounting principles between the current and prior year, as well as the amounts of assets or liabilities at the beginning of the current year. This was due to the client's record retention policies. If the amounts in question could materially affect current operating results, the auditor would:
a. Withdraw from the engagement and refuse to be associated with the financial statements.
b. Specifically state that the financial statements are not comparable to the prior year due to an uncertainty.
c. Express a qualified opinion on the financial statements because of a client-imposed scope limitations.
d. Be unable to express an opinion on the current year's results of operations and cash flows.
I got it that d is the correct answer but in Becker's explanation, it also says that the auditor could express an opinion on the statement of financial position. I just don't understand why the auditor could express an opinion while they can't verify beginning balances of assets and liabilities?
.