AUD Study Group October November 2013 - Page 11

Viewing 15 replies - 151 through 165 (of 1,096 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #477883
    JTS254
    Participant

    @Solo- You can absolutely fit those two in the same window. I'm on the same timeline as Sarita and took BEC and FAR in the July August window. I've got Audit scheduled for the first week of October and REG at the end of November.

    FAR - 84
    BEC - 89
    AUD - 93
    REG - 87

    #477930
    JTS254
    Participant

    @Solo- You can absolutely fit those two in the same window. I'm on the same timeline as Sarita and took BEC and FAR in the July August window. I've got Audit scheduled for the first week of October and REG at the end of November.

    FAR - 84
    BEC - 89
    AUD - 93
    REG - 87

    #477885
    MrsBing
    Member

    I got the following Becker question in A1. After reading A1, I could've sworn that I read that you can't issue different opinions on different statements, you can only issue one opinion on all statements as a whole, but I can't remember what page I read this on. Does this sound familiar to anyone? I know with the pre-clarity GAAS, you can issue different opinions on different statements, but the question doesn't specify pre or post clarity.

    An auditor who is unable to form an opinion on a new client's opening inventory balances may issue an unmodified opinion on the current year's:

    a.Statement of cash flows only.

    b.Statement of shareholders' equity only.

    c.Balance sheet only.

    d.Income statement only.

    Choice “c” is correct. If the auditor is unable to form an opinion on a new client's opening inventory balances, the auditor will issue an opinion on the closing balance sheet only and will issue a disclaimer of opinion on the statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows.

    Choices “d”, “a”, and “b” are incorrect. The auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion on these financial statements if the auditor is unable to form an opinion regarding opening inventory balances.

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #477932
    MrsBing
    Member

    I got the following Becker question in A1. After reading A1, I could've sworn that I read that you can't issue different opinions on different statements, you can only issue one opinion on all statements as a whole, but I can't remember what page I read this on. Does this sound familiar to anyone? I know with the pre-clarity GAAS, you can issue different opinions on different statements, but the question doesn't specify pre or post clarity.

    An auditor who is unable to form an opinion on a new client's opening inventory balances may issue an unmodified opinion on the current year's:

    a.Statement of cash flows only.

    b.Statement of shareholders' equity only.

    c.Balance sheet only.

    d.Income statement only.

    Choice “c” is correct. If the auditor is unable to form an opinion on a new client's opening inventory balances, the auditor will issue an opinion on the closing balance sheet only and will issue a disclaimer of opinion on the statements of income, retained earnings and cash flows.

    Choices “d”, “a”, and “b” are incorrect. The auditor should issue a disclaimer of opinion on these financial statements if the auditor is unable to form an opinion regarding opening inventory balances.

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #477887
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Mrsbing

    I just assumed it was clarified. What I am doing and I thought I also heard this somewhere was just assume clarified and on the exam it will be VERY clear if it is the old standards (it will tell you).

    #477934
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Mrsbing

    I just assumed it was clarified. What I am doing and I thought I also heard this somewhere was just assume clarified and on the exam it will be VERY clear if it is the old standards (it will tell you).

    #477889
    MrsBing
    Member

    If it's clarified, can the auditor express different opinions on different finanical statements?

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #477936
    MrsBing
    Member

    If it's clarified, can the auditor express different opinions on different finanical statements?

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #477890
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Generally, I don't think so. No piecemeal reporting under clarified.

    Someone please correct me if that's wrong. I remember this but I can't find it in the becker book for the life of me right now!

    #477938
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Generally, I don't think so. No piecemeal reporting under clarified.

    Someone please correct me if that's wrong. I remember this but I can't find it in the becker book for the life of me right now!

    #477891
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Mrsbing – check this out, it's an explanation from a question in A2 and I believe this is the theory of our issue with the new clarified standards.

    Piecemeal opinions (opinions on parts of the financial statements, when those parts constitute a major portion of the financial statements) are not appropriate if the auditor has disclaimed an opinion or issued an adverse opinion, because they may overshadow the auditor's opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole.

    If they are NOT a major element, lets say an opinion on a single account, then it is okay to issue different opinions.

    #477940
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Mrsbing – check this out, it's an explanation from a question in A2 and I believe this is the theory of our issue with the new clarified standards.

    Piecemeal opinions (opinions on parts of the financial statements, when those parts constitute a major portion of the financial statements) are not appropriate if the auditor has disclaimed an opinion or issued an adverse opinion, because they may overshadow the auditor's opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole.

    If they are NOT a major element, lets say an opinion on a single account, then it is okay to issue different opinions.

    #477893
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can a CPA perform duties authorized by client?

    Are there any limitations?

    #477942
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can a CPA perform duties authorized by client?

    Are there any limitations?

    #477895
    ItsStudyTime
    Member

    Solodolo – I'm taking BEC and AUD both this testing period. I've scheduled BEC for October 1 and AUD for October 21. If you put in some focused study time, you can definitely do it.

    BEC - 10/01/2013 - 80 - Wiley books and test bank
    AUD - 10/21/2013 - 78 - Wiley books and test bank
    REG - 11/27/2013 - 78 - Wiley books and test bank
    FAR - 01/13/2014 - 79 - Wiley books and test bank, Ninja Blitz

    License Issued 03/17/2014

Viewing 15 replies - 151 through 165 (of 1,096 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group October November 2013 - Page 11’ is closed to new replies.