- This topic has 1,172 replies, 140 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by
jeff.
-
CreatorTopic
-
May 23, 2013 at 7:53 pm #177709
jeffKeymasterAUD Resources:
Free AUD Notes & Audio – https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan
AUD 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
AUD Score Release: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-scores-results-release
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 23, 2013 at 1:55 am #438174
jeffKeymasterJuly 23, 2013 at 4:17 am #438029
AmayMemberHow long do we have to watch these free videos?
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 23, 2013 at 4:17 am #438176
AmayMemberHow long do we have to watch these free videos?
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 23, 2013 at 4:49 am #438031
AmayMemberAnother question I ran into also explains the beg. inv. question:
When the auditor is unable to satisfy himself or herself regarding the amount of beginning inventory, he or she must disclaim an opinion on the income statement because of the inability to verify the cost of goods sold during the year. The auditor may, however, still be able to issue an unmodified opinion on the balance sheet, since inventory can be verified as of the balance sheet date.
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 23, 2013 at 4:49 am #438178
AmayMemberAnother question I ran into also explains the beg. inv. question:
When the auditor is unable to satisfy himself or herself regarding the amount of beginning inventory, he or she must disclaim an opinion on the income statement because of the inability to verify the cost of goods sold during the year. The auditor may, however, still be able to issue an unmodified opinion on the balance sheet, since inventory can be verified as of the balance sheet date.
BEC: 73, 81
AUD: 85
FAR: 71, 77
REG: 74, 75...finally DONE! 😀*This is my 2nd attempt at the CPA exam. For all of you who have failed this exam many times, given up on it, or taken a break like me, remember that it is still possible to finish what you started...failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently 🙂
July 23, 2013 at 6:52 am #438033
AnonymousInactiveI got this MCQ from WTB. I understand how are the 3 incorrect answers as wrong. But I could not understand how the right answer as correct.
Could someone explain it a little better please? Thanks!
Before applying substantive procedures to the details of asset accounts at an interim date, an auditor should assess:
*The difficulty in controlling the incremental audit risk.
This answer is correct because professional standards require that an auditor assess the difficulty in controlling the incremental audit risk. In addition, the auditor should consider the cost of the substantive tests that are necessary to appropriately examine the remaining period.
1. Inherent risk at the maximum level > This answer is incorrect because while inherent risk may be at the maximum level, the situation in which it is not is more likely, since a lower level of risk is more likely to lead to interim testing.
2. Materiality for the accounts tested as insignificant >This answer is incorrect because the accounts tested need not be insignificant.
3. Control risk at below the maximum level > This answer is incorrect because while control risk (or risk of material misstatement) will generally be assessed at below the maximum level in such circumstances, this is not required.
July 23, 2013 at 6:52 am #438180
AnonymousInactiveI got this MCQ from WTB. I understand how are the 3 incorrect answers as wrong. But I could not understand how the right answer as correct.
Could someone explain it a little better please? Thanks!
Before applying substantive procedures to the details of asset accounts at an interim date, an auditor should assess:
*The difficulty in controlling the incremental audit risk.
This answer is correct because professional standards require that an auditor assess the difficulty in controlling the incremental audit risk. In addition, the auditor should consider the cost of the substantive tests that are necessary to appropriately examine the remaining period.
1. Inherent risk at the maximum level > This answer is incorrect because while inherent risk may be at the maximum level, the situation in which it is not is more likely, since a lower level of risk is more likely to lead to interim testing.
2. Materiality for the accounts tested as insignificant >This answer is incorrect because the accounts tested need not be insignificant.
3. Control risk at below the maximum level > This answer is incorrect because while control risk (or risk of material misstatement) will generally be assessed at below the maximum level in such circumstances, this is not required.
July 23, 2013 at 12:30 pm #438035
AnonymousInactiveAmordiva,
1. If risk is at the MAXIMUM level, you would not want to test at an interim date as a test at the end of the period provides more sufficient evidence. Hence, higher risk = more sufficient evidence.
2. You can test at an interim date for accounts that are material. You would want to ensure that risk was low and that controls were effective but the fact alone that an account is material doesn't preclude it from being tested at an interim date.
3. I can't really come up with a way to make this simpler. I would just read it and know that when we are testing at an interim date, our biggest concern is the risk from the date of testing to the end of the period.
Hope that helps some.
July 23, 2013 at 12:30 pm #438182
AnonymousInactiveAmordiva,
1. If risk is at the MAXIMUM level, you would not want to test at an interim date as a test at the end of the period provides more sufficient evidence. Hence, higher risk = more sufficient evidence.
2. You can test at an interim date for accounts that are material. You would want to ensure that risk was low and that controls were effective but the fact alone that an account is material doesn't preclude it from being tested at an interim date.
3. I can't really come up with a way to make this simpler. I would just read it and know that when we are testing at an interim date, our biggest concern is the risk from the date of testing to the end of the period.
Hope that helps some.
July 23, 2013 at 12:31 pm #438037
AnonymousInactiveDid this thread get condensed somehow? Yesterday this thread had 16 pages, today, only 10.
July 23, 2013 at 12:31 pm #438183
AnonymousInactiveDid this thread get condensed somehow? Yesterday this thread had 16 pages, today, only 10.
July 23, 2013 at 12:39 pm #438039
jeffKeymasterJuly 23, 2013 at 12:39 pm #438186
jeffKeymasterJuly 23, 2013 at 2:08 pm #438041
AnonymousInactiveJust a quick questions,
Is the Research AU is completely removed? We are going to be tested only on AU-C, right? I saw Beckers final review don't have AU-C. Can someone please confirm?
July 23, 2013 at 2:08 pm #438188
AnonymousInactiveJust a quick questions,
Is the Research AU is completely removed? We are going to be tested only on AU-C, right? I saw Beckers final review don't have AU-C. Can someone please confirm?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘AUD Study Group July August 2013 - Page 40’ is closed to new replies.
