- This topic has 430 replies, 118 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 9 months ago by
Ikile.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 1, 2013 at 5:22 pm #176449
jeffKeymasterResources:
AUD 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
AUD Exam Experience: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/aud-exam-experience-official-thread
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 22, 2013 at 8:06 pm #414781
AnonymousInactive@amordiva Thanks!
Looks great… will try to keep an ongoing list. (I copied and pasted your list below so it's easier)
Also- a compilation not expected to be used by third parties is called a plain paer report. An engagement letter (not a report) is used, and reference on each page of f/s to restrict use.
Reports that contain restriction use paragraph: 7 [FAF-SOFA]
• FS audit of a nonissuer concerning an auditor’s required communication of significant deficiencies in Internal control
• Agreed-upon Procedures Engagement
• Financial Projection
• Specified Element, Account, or Item prepared to comply with a contract or agreement
• OCBOA – Prescribed Regulatory Basis
• *Financial Presentation to comply with contractual agreement or regulatory provisions
• Application of Accounting Principles
*With an exception of when the presentation/report is filed with a regulatory agency like SEC & included in a document distributed to the GENERAL PUBLIC, then the report should NOT be restricted at all.
Just as Tim Gearty was highlighting, ‘IT'S A SECRET!” Or anything that's confidential, it should contain restriction paragraph.
May 22, 2013 at 8:06 pm #414782
AnonymousInactive@amordiva Thanks!
Looks great… will try to keep an ongoing list. (I copied and pasted your list below so it's easier)
Also- a compilation not expected to be used by third parties is called a plain paer report. An engagement letter (not a report) is used, and reference on each page of f/s to restrict use.
Reports that contain restriction use paragraph: 7 [FAF-SOFA]
• FS audit of a nonissuer concerning an auditor’s required communication of significant deficiencies in Internal control
• Agreed-upon Procedures Engagement
• Financial Projection
• Specified Element, Account, or Item prepared to comply with a contract or agreement
• OCBOA – Prescribed Regulatory Basis
• *Financial Presentation to comply with contractual agreement or regulatory provisions
• Application of Accounting Principles
*With an exception of when the presentation/report is filed with a regulatory agency like SEC & included in a document distributed to the GENERAL PUBLIC, then the report should NOT be restricted at all.
Just as Tim Gearty was highlighting, ‘IT'S A SECRET!” Or anything that's confidential, it should contain restriction paragraph.
May 22, 2013 at 8:06 pm #414783
AnonymousInactiveMay 23, 2013 at 7:48 pm #414784
AnonymousInactiveMay 23, 2013 at 8:15 pm #414785
AnonymousInactiveCongrats Casagarber on passing FAR and…I don't know how long your excitement for Audit will last :).
I'm in my final review stage and am trying to consolidate all my info down to small snipits for quick recall – my method for this is mnemonics. I am a strong advocate for them as they have helped me so much on REG and BEC. I thought I would put out a few of the ones I've started compiling for you all. If you have any that you use/did use that were helpful for you then please throw them out.
Standard Report = TAISOND (Hard to do one for this but I think of “Raisoned” and it works for some reason)
Title – “Independent”
Addressed – Board or stake; not manag
Intro – What was audited and resp of manag/auditor
Scope – GPEA (Like GPA but with an E) – GAAS, Performed and planed to reasonable assure no mat mistate, Examine evidence/assumptions for manag assertions, Audit basis for opinion
Opinion – ROC – Repeat what audited in intro, opinion, conformity w GAAP
Name
Date
Reasons for Explanatory paragraph to modify standard unqualified = DRESNG (Like “Dressing”)
Document in other info has audited FS info that is inconsistent w info in FS
Required SEC documents omitted/not reviewed
Emphasis of matter
Supplementary required GAAP info omitted/not reviewed
Necessary departure from GAAP/lack of consistency
Going concern issue
AICPA Code of Conduct on Quality Control = HELPME (from Becker but I think its good)
HR – Right people in right place
Engagement/Client Acceptance – Only manag w integrity
Leadership Resp – Tone @ the top
Performance – Supervised/Reviewed adequately
Monitoring – How can we be better?
Ethical Req – Maintain public confidence; Independence
Hopefully these are helpful for you all. Throw some others out there.
May 23, 2013 at 9:03 pm #414786
AnonymousInactiveMay 23, 2013 at 10:56 pm #414787
N. AlexMemberMay 23, 2013 at 10:56 pm #414788
N. AlexMemberMay 23, 2013 at 11:58 pm #414789
AnonymousInactiveI'm retaking audit on Saturday, May 25th. I previously took it in February and made a 73! After making a 73, I decided to purchase the 10 point combo. According to my performance report, I didn't do good on the simulations. I did fine on the MCQ's. I've done the MCQ, practiced simulations, and re-wrote the notes. I guess I need to continue reading the notes and doing the MCQ. Does anyone have any last minute advice?
A – 73 (2.16.13)
F – 83 (4.13.13)
B – Waiting on score (5.18.13)
R – 78 (expired 2.29.12); retake (July 13)
May 24, 2013 at 1:42 pm #414790
AnonymousInactiveOkay I'm trying to work out the audit risk model. This is my high level understanding, please correct me if I am off base:
Auditor sets the audit risk at beginning of engagement based on limited knowledge (no testing) then does some limited testing and analytical procedures to understand the entity thus gaining an assessed inherent risk and control risk. From this number the detection risk is simply the variable that is plugged in based off what it needs to be to equal the audit risk.
I know these assessments can change throughout the audit but is this the way to assess the audit risk at the beginning of the engagement? I also think I could have the audit risk and detection risk somewhat confused in how the assessment is determined in the model.
May 24, 2013 at 3:28 pm #414791
ZaqParticipantDoes anyone know how the Wiley sections correlate to Becker sections?
Some are obvious, but I'm not sure where Internal Control (Wiley) falls under in Becker. For reference:
Becker:
1.) Audit Reports
2.) Other Reports
3.) Engagement Acceptance, Planning, and Risk Assessment
4.) Audit Evidence
5.) Sampling & Communication
6.) Professional Responsibilities, Audit Documentation, Effect of IT, and Government Auditing
Wiley:
A.) Accounting and Review Services
B.) Audit Sampling
C.) Auditing With Technology
D.) Engagement Planning
E.) Evidence
F.) Internal Control
G.) Professional Responsibilities
H.) Reporting
I.) Research
FAR: 50, 76!
REG: 74... (ouch baby, very ouch), 76!
AUD: 65, 91!?
BEC: 80! Aaaand doneskies!May 2012 to August 2013. Can't believe it's over.
May 24, 2013 at 3:51 pm #414792
jeffKeymasterIf you hear a voice crack…it's just your imagination.
Link: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
May 24, 2013 at 7:18 pm #414793
nbad311MemberAfter 2 reschedules (and getting married), I am finally taking AUD for the first time on Sunday; on the very last day of my NTS period or else, honestly, I probably would've rescheduled again! I studied pretty hardcore for about a month, but that was back in Feb-March and I only got through about 60% of the material (which DIDN'T include the whole reports chapter!).
Since touching down on the mainland last Saturday returning from my Hawaiian honeymoon, I have had my head burried in a study book, only stopping to eat, sleep (a little), go back to work, and open a big batch of delivered wedding presents (but not putting them away or discarding the boxes yet – Monday chores!!). My 5 years of work experience has given me a good deal of audit and related experience and I currently work in an internal control-heavy role so I have that going for me. BEC was my last pass so I also have that on my side (IT stuff, some of the ratios). Ninja notes are also on board so I am going to cram tonight, tomorrow, and then attempt a deep sleep tomorrow night to prep for my 12:30pm EST exam on Sunday! Wish me luck! Either way wine will be had Sunday evening. 🙂
REG - 65, 70, 80!
BEC - 35, 62, 79!
AUD - 73, 75!
FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.May 24, 2013 at 7:58 pm #414794
AnonymousInactiveCan the auditor have the client be its underwriter and remain independent or is that not allowed?
May 24, 2013 at 8:04 pm #414795 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘AUD Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 27’ is closed to new replies.
