AUD Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 27

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 430 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #414781
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @amordiva Thanks!

    Looks great… will try to keep an ongoing list. (I copied and pasted your list below so it's easier)

    Also- a compilation not expected to be used by third parties is called a plain paer report. An engagement letter (not a report) is used, and reference on each page of f/s to restrict use.

    Reports that contain restriction use paragraph: 7 [FAF-SOFA]

    • FS audit of a nonissuer concerning an auditor’s required communication of significant deficiencies in Internal control

    • Agreed-upon Procedures Engagement

    • Financial Projection

    • Specified Element, Account, or Item prepared to comply with a contract or agreement

    • OCBOA – Prescribed Regulatory Basis

    • *Financial Presentation to comply with contractual agreement or regulatory provisions

    • Application of Accounting Principles

    *With an exception of when the presentation/report is filed with a regulatory agency like SEC & included in a document distributed to the GENERAL PUBLIC, then the report should NOT be restricted at all.

    Just as Tim Gearty was highlighting, ‘IT'S A SECRET!” Or anything that's confidential, it should contain restriction paragraph.

    #414782
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @amordiva Thanks!

    Looks great… will try to keep an ongoing list. (I copied and pasted your list below so it's easier)

    Also- a compilation not expected to be used by third parties is called a plain paer report. An engagement letter (not a report) is used, and reference on each page of f/s to restrict use.

    Reports that contain restriction use paragraph: 7 [FAF-SOFA]

    • FS audit of a nonissuer concerning an auditor’s required communication of significant deficiencies in Internal control

    • Agreed-upon Procedures Engagement

    • Financial Projection

    • Specified Element, Account, or Item prepared to comply with a contract or agreement

    • OCBOA – Prescribed Regulatory Basis

    • *Financial Presentation to comply with contractual agreement or regulatory provisions

    • Application of Accounting Principles

    *With an exception of when the presentation/report is filed with a regulatory agency like SEC & included in a document distributed to the GENERAL PUBLIC, then the report should NOT be restricted at all.

    Just as Tim Gearty was highlighting, ‘IT'S A SECRET!” Or anything that's confidential, it should contain restriction paragraph.

    #414783
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    #414784
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hey Guys! Just passed FAR and tonight I begin studying for AUD. Excited for some new material!

    #414785
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Congrats Casagarber on passing FAR and…I don't know how long your excitement for Audit will last :).

    I'm in my final review stage and am trying to consolidate all my info down to small snipits for quick recall – my method for this is mnemonics. I am a strong advocate for them as they have helped me so much on REG and BEC. I thought I would put out a few of the ones I've started compiling for you all. If you have any that you use/did use that were helpful for you then please throw them out.

    Standard Report = TAISOND (Hard to do one for this but I think of “Raisoned” and it works for some reason)

    Title – “Independent”

    Addressed – Board or stake; not manag

    Intro – What was audited and resp of manag/auditor

    Scope – GPEA (Like GPA but with an E) – GAAS, Performed and planed to reasonable assure no mat mistate, Examine evidence/assumptions for manag assertions, Audit basis for opinion

    Opinion – ROC – Repeat what audited in intro, opinion, conformity w GAAP

    Name

    Date

    Reasons for Explanatory paragraph to modify standard unqualified = DRESNG (Like “Dressing”)

    Document in other info has audited FS info that is inconsistent w info in FS

    Required SEC documents omitted/not reviewed

    Emphasis of matter

    Supplementary required GAAP info omitted/not reviewed

    Necessary departure from GAAP/lack of consistency

    Going concern issue

    AICPA Code of Conduct on Quality Control = HELPME (from Becker but I think its good)

    HR – Right people in right place

    Engagement/Client Acceptance – Only manag w integrity

    Leadership Resp – Tone @ the top

    Performance – Supervised/Reviewed adequately

    Monitoring – How can we be better?

    Ethical Req – Maintain public confidence; Independence

    Hopefully these are helpful for you all. Throw some others out there.

    #414786
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Question on a Becker MC – “The objective of the fourth standard is to prevent…”

    Answer: Misinterpretations regarding the degree of responsibility the auditor is assuming.

    What am I missing here..how does the opinion rendered have any effect on the responsibility the auditor is assuming?

    #414787
    N. Alex
    Member

    @ Adamdenton1

    “reasonable assurance”

    Becker A1-11 bullet (a) in the middle of the page

    #414788
    N. Alex
    Member

    @ Adamdenton1

    “reasonable assurance”

    Becker A1-11 bullet (a) in the middle of the page

    #414789
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm retaking audit on Saturday, May 25th. I previously took it in February and made a 73! After making a 73, I decided to purchase the 10 point combo. According to my performance report, I didn't do good on the simulations. I did fine on the MCQ's. I've done the MCQ, practiced simulations, and re-wrote the notes. I guess I need to continue reading the notes and doing the MCQ. Does anyone have any last minute advice?

    A – 73 (2.16.13)

    F – 83 (4.13.13)

    B – Waiting on score (5.18.13)

    R – 78 (expired 2.29.12); retake (July 13)

    #414790
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay I'm trying to work out the audit risk model. This is my high level understanding, please correct me if I am off base:

    Auditor sets the audit risk at beginning of engagement based on limited knowledge (no testing) then does some limited testing and analytical procedures to understand the entity thus gaining an assessed inherent risk and control risk. From this number the detection risk is simply the variable that is plugged in based off what it needs to be to equal the audit risk.

    I know these assessments can change throughout the audit but is this the way to assess the audit risk at the beginning of the engagement? I also think I could have the audit risk and detection risk somewhat confused in how the assessment is determined in the model.

    #414791
    Zaq
    Participant

    Does anyone know how the Wiley sections correlate to Becker sections?

    Some are obvious, but I'm not sure where Internal Control (Wiley) falls under in Becker. For reference:

    Becker:

    1.) Audit Reports

    2.) Other Reports

    3.) Engagement Acceptance, Planning, and Risk Assessment

    4.) Audit Evidence

    5.) Sampling & Communication

    6.) Professional Responsibilities, Audit Documentation, Effect of IT, and Government Auditing

    Wiley:

    A.) Accounting and Review Services

    B.) Audit Sampling

    C.) Auditing With Technology

    D.) Engagement Planning

    E.) Evidence

    F.) Internal Control

    G.) Professional Responsibilities

    H.) Reporting

    I.) Research

    FAR: 50, 76!
    REG: 74... (ouch baby, very ouch), 76!
    AUD: 65, 91!?
    BEC: 80! Aaaand doneskies!

    May 2012 to August 2013. Can't believe it's over.

    #414792
    jeff
    Keymaster

    If you hear a voice crack…it's just your imagination.

    Link: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

    #414793
    nbad311
    Member

    After 2 reschedules (and getting married), I am finally taking AUD for the first time on Sunday; on the very last day of my NTS period or else, honestly, I probably would've rescheduled again! I studied pretty hardcore for about a month, but that was back in Feb-March and I only got through about 60% of the material (which DIDN'T include the whole reports chapter!).

    Since touching down on the mainland last Saturday returning from my Hawaiian honeymoon, I have had my head burried in a study book, only stopping to eat, sleep (a little), go back to work, and open a big batch of delivered wedding presents (but not putting them away or discarding the boxes yet – Monday chores!!). My 5 years of work experience has given me a good deal of audit and related experience and I currently work in an internal control-heavy role so I have that going for me. BEC was my last pass so I also have that on my side (IT stuff, some of the ratios). Ninja notes are also on board so I am going to cram tonight, tomorrow, and then attempt a deep sleep tomorrow night to prep for my 12:30pm EST exam on Sunday! Wish me luck! Either way wine will be had Sunday evening. 🙂

    REG - 65, 70, 80!
    BEC - 35, 62, 79!
    AUD - 73, 75!
    FAR - 65, 73, 70, 75! DONE.

    #414794
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can the auditor have the client be its underwriter and remain independent or is that not allowed?

    #414795
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @nbad311 – good luck!!

    I do not like the audit objectives pertaining to management assertions portion of the AUD exam. I take it Saturday at 8:00 in the morning.

Viewing 15 replies - 391 through 405 (of 430 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 27’ is closed to new replies.