- This topic has 8 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
I am working through my NINJA notes and WTB and am getting confused regarding consistency.
In the Notes it says that consistency is NOT violated by 1) reclassifications 2) prospective treatment of a new principle 3) accounting errors 4) accounting estimate change
This should result in an unqualified opinion
In WTB it lists consistency should be referred to in the opinion paragraph due to 1) change in entity 2) change in principle 3) corrections or errors 4) change in principle inseperable from a change in estimate
This should result in an unqualified opinion with an explanatory paragraph
What’s getting me confused is the difference between each lists 2) and 3) and when each is appropriate (what’s the difference between a prospective treatment or a principle and a principle change? or why do I refer to a change in error but not an error itself? )
Any help to clear up this confusion would be greatly appreciated π
3XBEC:75 * 4XREG:82 * 4XFAR:76 * 7XAUD:77
βIt is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed.β Theodore Roosevelt
- The topic ‘AUD – question regarding consistency and when to refer to in opinion paragraph’ is closed to new replies.