AUD Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 24

Viewing 15 replies - 346 through 360 (of 452 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1788751
    Julia
    Participant

    Famh110: thank u. Ur explanation helped loads.
    This weekend was great: posted details on Power Weekend thread. But 540 MCQ in 12 hours. Average score & trending scores went up 5 points. I'm happy w the results. Was drained today & operated on cruise control @ work. Lol.

    #1789035
    famh110
    Participant

    @Julia- I am glad it helped. I think i said incorrectly first that it was posted on the power weekend thread instead i looked and realized that it was on the actual question thread, i am happy you were able to locate it. You have made great progress over the weekend. How far are you in the adaptive learning phase? I am 21% in assessment phase. Need to reach 35% before assessment will begin for me. I am scoring the lowest in category 4 (Evaluating) and the second lowest in category 3 (Performing).

    #1789039
    famh110
    Participant

    @pdiddy…all the best tomorrow! we are rooting for you 🙂

    #1789045
    Joetse
    Participant

    The business is the CONSIGNEE. Since they only HOLD as custody the CONSIGNOR'S inventory as agent until it is sold, it is NOT included in the inventory balance. (It's included in the CONSIGNOR'S inventory until the inventory is sold to an outside retail buyer). Think Nordstrom's or Macy's. They hold cloths on consignment as consignee. They hold Versace, Michael Kors, Gucci, etc. Those manufacturers are the CONSIGNORS. Their inventory is OUT ON CONSIGNMENT, with Nordstroms acting as CONSIGNEE (acting as agent selling on behalf of Versace, Gucci, etc). Usually consignees are just middle men. Since it's not Nordstrom's inventory (only Nordstrom branded clothing is their REAL inventory), and they're just being used to park other manufacturer's inventory as a pretty warehouse, but they included it in their own inventory, they have to back it out. Now, you could always buy direct from Versace, but then they'd be shipping directly from Italy. Make more sense now?

    #1789053
    Joetse
    Participant

    I think for A., the procedure could have been done already and these guys are stepping in or engaged later in the year and somehow previous auditors withdrew. So you first consider what's been done ytd before diving in any preliminary or heavy procedures. First step in planning is seeing what's already been done and scoping out the environment, asking questions, etc. before doing any procedures. Only if they were a brand new company, and you knew there was no previous auditor or work ever done, is digging right in to understanding the entity's controls and doing prelims makes sense.

    #1789408
    PDiddy2000
    Participant

    @famh110

    Thanks!! I'm going over the focus notes that I received from Wiley before I head to the testing center at noon. I woke up a little earlier than I would’ve have liked this morning but I feel ready to take AUD. Fingers crossed!!

    #1790458
    famh110
    Participant

    @pdiddy2000…Let us know how it went for you.

    #1790806
    Julia
    Participant

    I am Home sick today. Debating on trying to study. Laying home sick is too hard. Lol.

    #1790838
    PDiddy2000
    Participant

    Hi everyone – took AUD yesterday. I started studying on April 3 the day after I took FAR. So I studied for about 5 weeks and average about 30 hours a week. I used Wiley and was able to go through all the information in 4 weeks then used the last week to review information and work on my trouble areas. I did over a 1,000 MCQs and about 20 SIMs in Wiley testbank. I also did a walkthrough of the AUD AICPA blueprint.

    The Good: I feel ok about the SIMs. I highly recommend looking at the AICPA blueprint for every exam. Not so much for the answers but just to get a feel about the format of how the AICPA may choose to present some SIMs. I went over a few testbank SIMs on Wiley and didn't get one on the exam that was formatted in the same way. However, I did see a few of the same SIM formats on the exam that were on the AICPA blueprints.

    The Bad: The MCQs were a disaster. I can't gauge how well I did because a vast majority of the questions focused on “the most likely” or “the least likely” answer. I realize these questions are a necessary evil but the number of those type of questions on my exam is overkill in my opinion. Maybe I got the wrong exam. The funny thing is while I didn't feel extraordinarily confident about how I did on FAR, I feel like I did better on FAR then AUD. At the end of the day, I will just have to wait until June 27 just like everyone else. The good thing is that I planned 3 exams for Q2 so I don't drive my self crazy thinking about my scores for 3 months. 🙂 Well my next test date is June 8 for BEC so I'm heading over to the BEC Q2 forum. Good Luck everyone!!

    #1791157
    PDiddy2000
    Participant

    I want to point out that when I mentioned the AICPA blueprint in my above statement, I actually mean the practice tests on the AICPA website. I was looking at the BEC blueprint when I was typing my comment this morning and had that on my brain. 🙂

    #1791304
    jeff
    Keymaster
    #1791862
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi,
    I have a question regarding this multiple choice on subsequent event. Is the reason why no adjustment to FS is necessary because this is due to customer filing bankruptcy due a natural disaster? I thought any loss on receivable due to bankruptcy requires both adjustments and disclosures.
    Your help is greatly appreciated.

    Zero Corp. suffered a loss that would have a material effect on its financial statements on an uncollectible trade account receivable due to a customer's bankruptcy. This occurred suddenly due to a natural disaster 10 days after Zero's balance sheet date, but one month before the issuance of the financial statements and the auditor's report. Under these circumstances:

    the financial statements should be adjusted.
    –> CORRECT ANSWER. the event requires financial statement disclosure, but no adjustment
    the auditor's report should be modified for a lack of consistency.
    A.
    I only

    Incorrect B.
    Both I and III

    C.
    Both II and III

    D.
    II only

    #1792281
    ly741237952
    Participant

    Hi guys have a last minute question about attribute sampling –
    if the attributes are not directly listed on the table, do we get the closest number or do we manually calculate the sample size/upper deviation rate?

    #1792486
    Tigre5565
    Participant

    Cannot emphasize enough knowing the nuances and rules between SSARSs, SSAE, SAS, Type 1 and Type 2, Single Audit, etc. Should try to have firm gasp on Examination vs Review vs Audit vs Compilation vs Preparation.

    Knowing this was much more helpful than remembering mnemonics during exam prep imo.

    #1792569
    famh110
    Participant

    @Tigre Thanks for your recommendations. Sometimes the questions on these topics can get tricky. I need to work on those a bit more.
    @Pdiddy, at least its over and you have moved on to something else so score delay won't bother you as much. @Julia, hope you are doing better now!! Last 3 days, I have been very busy so haven't made much progress. I have moved my exam to the 29th as I didn't realize I have to go out of town to attend my niece's college graduation ceremony this weekend. Even though, I have been declining all the other invitations but i couldn't cop out on this one so will go and come back the very next day. Will have plenty of opportunity to hear to NINJA Audio during the commute so thats the plan for now.

Viewing 15 replies - 346 through 360 (of 452 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group – Q2 2018 - Page 24’ is closed to new replies.