CPA vs CFA

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1567174
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So I don’t want to spend the money on a MBA so I was planning to take the chance in getting a CPA. In CA, it’s now required to earn an additional 150 hrs (not just the basic education requirements) in order to get a license. So maybe I can study my butt off and take courses/boot camp to do the CFA exams. A master’s degree isn’t required. Has anyone gone thru both CPA and CFA. Which is “easier”, more doable to pass. I have 10+ years of being a financial manager/analyst with an undergraduate economics degree. I don’t want to quit my full time job. Also, my company doesn’t pay for continuing education

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1567179
    Anthony
    Participant

    CPA vs CFA are two completely different things. Not sure what is your long term goals are, but you should pick one that will help you achieve your goal. No point in wasting time and money on things that won't benefit your career.

    Other than that, CPA is “easier”. CFA will take at least 3-4 grueling years to get through the exams and not to mention 4 years of experience required.

    #1567327
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CFA is supposed to be the CPA but 2-3x's as much material and more advanced math. Difficulty of topics are supposed to be about the same. Many CFA candidates complain about the Financial Reporting section on CFA level 2 as the hardest part of the exam. Thankfully we have been exposed to FAR, so it should be second nature to us if u did well on FAR.

    Overall, CFA is 2x or
    more harder than the CPA due to the amount of material, length of time to finish exam, and the advanced finance/economics topics that are only covered in top MBA programs or they are not covered until u study for the CFA.

    Also, if u are very, very smart u could complete the CFA in 18 months, but very few candidates pull it off.

    My advice: focus on the CPA bc u will get a better return unless you went to a top 20 B-school and have an excellent network of high finance professionals. All of this information I have learned by speaking with CFA candidates in online forums, so take it for what it is worth.

    Goodluck.

    #1573685
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am a CPA (For context I took this right after undergrad and failed FAR twice and REG once…big exams like these never have come easy to me and it almost killed me but I got through it) and passed Level 1 of the CFA Exam, failed Level 2 last year and likely failed Level 2 again this year (pending results…I think I feel worse this year because I knew more, though I realize how that sounds).

    From experience, CFA is materially harder than the CPA. Absolutely no argument.

    #1573730
    NebCPA
    Participant

    I have passed both. Took the CPA because I’m an accountant; took the CFA for ego; probably a waste of time, but I didn’t have to pay for it.

    I actually disagree with the previous posters based on your background, and I think the CFA may be the easier route for you to go down.

    CFA Part 1 is weighted heavily toward Intermediate Accounting 1 knowledge, which will give you trouble and require studying. Other than that though, you should be good with the economics, statistics, finance, fixed income/equity securities, and minimal knowledge on alternative investments and derivatives. Overall, you should have a decent foundation for Part 1.

    Part 2 is difficult to know. It will requires you to have a very good working knowledge of how to value securities and derivatives and the accounting knowledge requires a good understanding of intermediate accounting II. If you plan on taking the exam, and you don’t have an accounting degree, this will be almost all new knowledge that you will need to learn. At the end of the day, tough, it’s a lot of math and memorization of formulas. With an economics degree, especially if you have an econometrics background, I don’t think the math would be too challenging, just require you to learn the process.

    First two parts are multiple choice with only three answer choices, so worse case, you get 33.3% on the questions you don’t know (unless you’re really unlucky). Third part has case studies and weighs heavily towards portfolio management, which, again, you sound like you have a background in.

    I’d say the CPA would be a more difficult exam for you. You don’t have a background in regulation/taxes, auditing, or financial accounting, so you would need to learn almost everything. The only part you have a foundation for on the CPA is BEC.

    As for timeframe, it would, arguably, take you longer to get the CPA than the CFA, especially considering you can’t sit the exam yet. You can take the CFA Part 1 in Dec 2017, which would require minimum studying, Part 2 next June 2018, which would require a bit more studying, and close it out in June 2019. You could have the whole thing knocked out in two years.

    The final thing I’ll say is you appear to meet the work experience requirements for the CFA already, while you don’t appear to meet the work requirements for the CPA – this would depend on your specific work history and state requirements – so once you passed the CFA, you could begin using the designation right away while the CPA would possibly require two more years and a career shift.

    As another poster stated, it really depends on your goals and future plans more than anything.

    Best of Luck.

     
    CFA Review Test Bank

Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘CPA vs CFA’ is closed to new replies.