[Number_cruncher32]

I started out in tax when I first started in public accounting. Then I worked in audit at national CPA firm for a number of years and moved up to manager, but over time I have decided that I liked tax more than audit. I am currently working at a small CPA firm in which the audit department also does some tax work so I have both prepared and reviewed tax returns at my current firm. I really want to do primarily tax (although I like compilations and reviews,too;just not audit). I also like helping clients with their bookkeeping/accounting questions. Although I have tax experience, I have more audit experience so at this point I don’t think my tax experience is at the same level as my audit experience. So my question is, do you think it would be worth it to get a Masters in Taxation at this point (part-time while still working full time)? I have a masters (just not specifically in tax) and I have my CPA license. I would like to eventually either be a partner in a small CPA firm or start my own firm.

[monikernc]

I don’t think paying what it costs to get a masters is worth it for you if you are already licensed. I had an MBA and went back for undergrad accounting classes to get licensed and feel I only missed the business tax classes. You can take a biz tax class but learning from experienced preparers in the environment you are in is the best way to learn. I also participate in a tax workgroup with other sole practitioners through my state’s CPA society where we discuss issues and questions that we have and I find that so helpful. I also really like the CPE courses offered by the Pacific Northwest Tax School. The instructor is very thorough. Even her inexpensive non-CPE credit offerings are really good. Her documentation is good. You can find her pre-2017 videos for free on YouTube to see if you like it. She is a seasoned EA and quite knowledgeable.

FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something different

[AGI]

My answer would be NO – unless you are thinking landing on a tax job via the school's connection.

The truth is – I think you can pick up any knowledge on tax if you read enough law book & the IRS instructions (and you got the software). I don't see how getting a master will get you anywhere.

What you need is an opportunity to PROOF that you know tax and can land a tax job. Find what you are interested in tax, and take some classes to sharpen your specialty in that topic, good enough.

New York - NYC
Passed CPA Exam (11/2014)
In search for a position in NYC that will fulfills the license requirement.

[Mikey]

You could pick up your EA. It's cheap, but in my opinion is a good addition to the “arsenal.”

[Accounting_is_Taxing]

It's pointless to get the EA if you already have a CPA license.

[monikernc]

I think the value of acquiring the EA is the cheap training/study materials for the knowledge acquired. I think it covers a lot of areas, and in more depth than the CPA REG exam does. I have a friend who did it after his CPA and he was surprised at how much more he learned about tax filing and IRS practices.

FAR 7/25/15 76!
AUD 10/30/15 93
BEC 2/27/16 82
REG 5/23/16 88!
Ninja Book and MCQ and the forum - all the way!!!
and a little thing i like to call, time and effort!
if you want things to change, you have to do something different

[Author]

Replies